How Adobe InDesign Took Over |
Giles Hoover's digital home for book design and photography. Features Foreword, a book design blog.
book design, photography, design, books, landscape photography, architecture photography, location photography, custom photography, art, foreword, blog, Giles Hoover, giles,
51046
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-51046,single-format-link,edgt-core-1.3.2,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,vigor-ver-3.1, vertical_menu_with_scroll,smooth_scroll,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.0.2,vc_responsive
 

How Adobe InDesign Took Over

How Adobe InDesign Took Over

Way back in the day — that is, before the mid-nineties — publishing on the Mac consisted of Quark XPress. Okay, sure, there was Aldus Publisher and some bit players, but it was basically Quark or nothing. I used Quark in book design back then, and … basically hated it.

I was one of the early adopters of InDesign, dragging co-workers and companies along with me, as part of my time working at Tropicana. Not the juice cartons themselves — those were done in Illustrator — but the ancillary stuff, like marketing materials, sell sheets, and so on.

AppleInsider ran a piece a while ago (I’d missed it, initially), “How Adobe InDesign took over publishing with Steve Jobs’ help.” Good history for those of you who don’t know about those days or want a trip down memory lane, best summarized, in fact, by a commenter on the article: “This covers an interesting arc. Adobe went from an ambitious upstart trying to unseat an established, albeit arrogant, standard, to becoming the arrogant standard.”

Read on.

Giles Hoover
gh@gileshoover.com

Book designer and photographer.

No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.